Discourse Blog

Discourse Blog

Share this post

Discourse Blog
Discourse Blog
Finally: A Good TV Show With Swords in It
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
User's avatar
Discover more from Discourse Blog
A daily politics, media criticism, and culture newsletter from the left. Worker-owned, subscriber-supported, and free from corporate influence. Est. 2020.
Over 22,000 subscribers
Already have an account? Sign in

Finally: A Good TV Show With Swords in It

Hulu's "Shōgun" is scratching an itch that has gone untended for so long.

Jack Crosbie's avatar
Jack Crosbie
Feb 28, 2024
35

Share this post

Discourse Blog
Discourse Blog
Finally: A Good TV Show With Swords in It
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
7
1
Share
Hulu/FX

The explosion of internet streaming and the global audience’s vast appetite for entertainment has created a vast glut of television. There are, to put it simply, so many shows. Making good shows, however, is difficult, and while the past several years have been rife with successes (White Lotus, Succession, The Bear) and things that are not good but have comfortably poleaxed my frontal lobe in tough times (Emily in Paris, 5,000 other things like The Recruit on Netflix), we have, since the ignominious end of Game of Thrones, had a conspicuously sword-shaped hole in the essential, big-budget TV viewing lineup.

Shōgun, which began airing on Hulu yesterday, is hitting that spot. That’s all I can say! It has swords. It has guys talking in funny little accents and voices and a whole lot of other dudes talking in another language (in this case, Japanese) that they use aesthetically pleasing sans-serif subtitles for. It has, most importantly, a budget that is going to work.

This last point is what makes Shōgun so appealing to me. It does not look cheap. It looks good. There is plenty of CGI, of course, as no show can exist without it these days, but much of the action appears shot on real sets with real people and in real lighting conditions. There is no use of deep shadow to conceal an overreliance on second-rate visual effects. There is no use of deep shadow to create… I have no idea, unwatchable bullshit? Sure, there are dark scenes. But you can see the things you want to see, and see them well, and they are good (the cinematography is excellent). Look here: a gorgeous collection of shots from the first episode.

But all of this belies perhaps the most important point: swords. I have only seen one episode of Shōgun but so far it features quite a lot of swords. The swords look good. We have yet to see anyone actually fight anyone with swords (we have had an implied seppuku, a quick decapitation, and some general sword-waving), but I am confident that when we do get to the parts with sword fighting it is going to be good. This is important to me, as a man with the interests and temperament of a teenage boy. The costumes are fantastic. The sets are fantastic. The acting is competent and at some points compelling. In my group chats my friends are saying things like “TV is back, baby!!” They are planning for watch parties, which in my experience are always way more fun conceptually than they are in practice (Unless your home can devote an entire couch or at least half a couch to each guest then it is inferior to my home, where I have one very big couch that my wife and I can lie on.)

Share

It is clear that this show was both a labor of love and a tremendous financial gamble. Period shows are expensive to make; period shows with expansive sets and lots of battles (assumedly) even more so. They are putting money money into this thing; $250 million, allegedly. It is all based on a popular but not ubiquitous novel of the same name from the 70s. There are many intersecting plotlines and a vast power struggle playing out between morally complex characters. The “protagonist” per se is a bloodthirsty imperialist anti-hero who hates Catholics, and his foils in the Japanese kingdoms are equal parts sympathetic and psychotically ruthless (they put a guy to death in a particularly “Viserys Targaryen but worse” way in the first episode.) There are High Stakes and assumedly Romance and a whole lot of Plotting, all given their full due. I love it. I am going to watch the rest of it. Finally, a good show with swords.


Subscribe to Discourse Blog

Thousands of paid subscribers
A daily politics, media criticism, and culture newsletter from the left. Worker-owned, subscriber-supported, and free from corporate influence. Est. 2020.
DonKedik's avatar
Rafi Schwartz's avatar
Katie's avatar
Aram Zucker-Scharff's avatar
Samantha Grasso's avatar
35 Likes∙
1 Restack
35

Share this post

Discourse Blog
Discourse Blog
Finally: A Good TV Show With Swords in It
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
7
1
Share

Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Katherine Krueger's avatar
Katherine Krueger
Feb 29, 2024

i like sword

Expand full comment
Like (3)
Reply
Share
J_'s avatar
J_
Feb 28, 2024

Hiroyuki Sanada makes anything good. Man’s a king.

Expand full comment
Like (3)
Reply
Share
5 more comments...
Bari Weiss Is Full of Shit
Her big trans panic story turned out to be nonsense, just like everything else she does.
Mar 2, 2023 • 
Katherine Krueger
304

Share this post

Discourse Blog
Discourse Blog
Bari Weiss Is Full of Shit
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
5
CNN's Disgraceful Propaganda
This segment from Dana Bash on the Palestine protest movement is one of the most shameful things I have ever seen on cable news.
May 2, 2024 • 
Jack Mirkinson
136

Share this post

Discourse Blog
Discourse Blog
CNN's Disgraceful Propaganda
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
55
No Hell Is Hot Enough for Joe Biden
I hope he’s faced with the horror he’s wrought when judgment comes to meet him.
Jan 17 • 
Katherine Krueger
84

Share this post

Discourse Blog
Discourse Blog
No Hell Is Hot Enough for Joe Biden
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
4

Ready for more?

© 2025 Discourse Blog Inc.
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share

Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More

Create your profile

User's avatar

Only paid subscribers can comment on this post

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in

Check your email

For your security, we need to re-authenticate you.

Click the link we sent to , or click here to sign in.